Monday, October 31, 2022

How Big is the Pressmud opportunity for CBG production in India?

 


A.      Background:

The article is intended to enlighten the availability of press mud for CBG production in India and competition from alternate usage today and tomorrow.

The press mud is combination of two world press and mud which has a history attached to it. The sugar cane juice after extraction from cane undergo pasteurization process to disinfect any presence of bacterial infection before further processing. The Sterilized juice then treated for removal of mud, organic precipitates which come along the juice extraction process apart from high molecular weight complex sugars which will interfere in production of sugar at later stage of the processing. It literally means the mud recovered from juice clarification is mechanically pressed to recovery maximum possible sugar from it in equipment called Rotary vacuum filter (R.V.F.). The press mud is also called as “maili” in Hindi which means soil contaminated stream. R.V.F. is widely used equipment which needs addition of bagasilo as filter Aid traditionally which are fine bagasse particles which impart cellulose and hemicellulose fractions in Pressmud. These fraction are the only digestible fraction apart from residual sugar in it which is explored for generation of biogas in recent past.



There is one more method rose to fame of mud separation by decanter which due to its inherent limitation haven not received well by most of the sugar factories which separate the mud without requirement of any filter Aid and pressmud from such sugar factories known to yield negligible biogas in various runs by researchers at various levels.

 

B.      Pressmud Production trends and Present usage

The Indian avg sugar production in recent past is about 30-32 MMT and Our sugar cane crushing is about 350-400 MMT on about 500 sugar factories across India. The values could vary here and there a bit but the trend will prevail mostly. The Indian in house sugar consumption is about 25-26 MMT and by an average we used to have roughly 6-7 MMT of sugar is in excess every year in recent past till govt allowed the production of Ethanol under EBP and farmer cane arrear issues built-up apart from cash outflow on export subsidy.

The average pressmud production as per production at 3.5 to 4% w/w of the crushing will stand at 12 to14 MMT per annum.

The most prominent use of pressmud in the history and at present is for bio-composting distillery spent wash which limited the Ethanol production over the years and NGT actions leading to push for ZLD in distillery which is one of the most polluting red category industry.

India has more than 350 distilleries producing about 5-6 Billion liters of Ethanol from sugar bearing feedstock which lead to about 50-60 Billion liters of effluent for disposal.

In recent past Ethanol production has grown mainly on account of incineration boiler for ZLD which reduced requirement of pressmud for composting. Roughly 1-1.5-Billion-liter capacity has Incineration boiler and balance are having Biomethanation route of ZLD with Composting. The effluent disposal of about 4 to 4.5 billion liters worth production literally needs about 10-11 billion liter effluent disposal and at 1-1.5 composting ratio it demands 8-11 MMT pressmud. Which is largely equal to total production in India.

As most of the distilleries shifting to non-composting sustainable route of effluent Managment due PCB pressure and need for increased production due to push from Govt for EBP the pressmud is gradually freeing up. There is slight stagnancy in the plant going for incineration boiler in recent past due to drastic reduction in effluent generation due to use of high sugar bearing fractions from sugar mill for production of Ethanol. This situation lead to impact on economic viability of incineration boiler as a mode of ZLD and exploration of other mode of ZLD a need of the hour.

At the same time spent wash nutrients must go back to sugar cane fields because major nutrient is Potassium which is in abundance in spent wash. Unfortunately India has 100% import of potassium in the tune of 2.5 to 3 million Mt. We have about 5.3 million hectors of Area under cane plantation. The avg. potassium requirement of plant is about 90 to 100 kg/Ha which translate to about 0.53 million Mt i.e. about 20% of the import could be saved by effective use of spent wash as a fertilizer via bio-compost or any other rout of recycling spent wash to cane fields.

As most of the consumption is for composting in their own distillery or offtake by some standalone distillery unit in some cases never ever stressed / posed press mud as a disposal issue and if some small quantity demand disposal then storage in yard for 20-30 days reduces its volume by 1/3rd which reduced the scale of issue as off now.

So with this back ground whosoever speaks to sugar industry they will not project pressmud as issue due to in-house consumption avenues and excess if any at location could be used for building relation with farmer by giving it to them as Fertlizer.

However, spent wash bio-composting is still a mode of spent wash disposal than fertilizer production facility. The profitable ways of fertilizer offtake and marketing is still a challenge to address to the greater extent.

As the mud portion is coming from Farm and anyways goes back to farm as humus after composting.  The bagasilo portion which is Actually part of bagasse has organic which could be converted to biogas which slightly difficult ways than selling it as fuel in local brick kilns in UP and other part of India was a regular affair for disposal as offtake was always been issue for bulk quantities until NGT crackdown on such kilns on pollution aspect in northern India.

As more and more distillery will shift to non-composting based ZLD routes pressmud will gradually open up and build as issue for disposal if not converted to Biogas in coming time.

The surplus sugar has potential to produce about 3.5 to 4.5 Billion liter of Ethanol as of now where as our requirement based on NITI Aayog projection will be over 10 Billion liters which need a serious after though about feedstock’s and technology if our internal sugar consumption not gone down to free up the extra sugar or innovative farming technology which will increase the sugar cane yield for EBP in near future which looks one of the major challenge and hurdle in the Ethanol boom to sustain in near future.

 

C.      Future usage of Pressmud and facts

EBP is been significant part of Indian energy dashboard in recent part and industries along with technology suppliers looking out to various feedstock which could be potentially converted to Ethanol or liquid biofuel economically.

Pressmud could be converted to pellets for combustion after drying by small sugar factories is near future due to restriction on composting and unviability of CBG plant due to viable capacity. Pressmud like high ash fuels will pose its own challenges in disposal for sure but due to disproportionate increase in coal prices use of pressmud for fuel gained lot of traction in recent past. How sustainable way of utilizing pressmud is to be seen in near future with overall impact of environment.

Bagasse could be one of the potential product moving forward can be converted to CBG as Power PPA has seen downward trends in recent past and no significant upward movement is expected in time to come. However existing investment in co-generation plants will largely limit this shift considering majority of investment in cogeneration plants is on BOOT basis. The avg available free bagasse in today’s scenario is about 10-20 MMT which is mostly used as fuel, paper and board manufacturing India at on date.

As paper and board are value selling products can afford cost variations apart from fuel application at some locations so overall project economics will drive its conversion to various byproducts in near future. The is possibility of conversion of bagasse to 2G ethanol at prohibitive price for private investor as on date and any update moving forward will be interesting to watch out. These value are really good indicator for industry to chalk out the business goals in near and immediate future.

I personally feel use of pressmud and bagasse to extract maximum value by converting it to CBG for mills would be potential option to evaluate.

 

D.      Conclusion and Recommendations moving forward

a.       Pressmud will pose major disposal issue in near future if not converted to value added co-product such as CBG by sugar industry.

b.       Pressmud  and bagasse to Ethanol using 2G Biomass to Ethanol technology being lignocellulose based substrate and overall process will be distance possibility and troublesome due to handling and investment number in such technology.

c.       Pressmud will be available more and more in coming future as NGT will tight grip on red category industry looking at present ZLD technology credentials apart from Slop fired boilers which is largely a known devil in ethanol industry. 

Friday, October 14, 2022

UTTAR PRADESH STATE BIOENERGY POLICY 2022: CATALYST IN ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY

 


Uttar Pradesh was one of the flag bearers in the Indian Bioenergy sector. The government has always extended its helping hand to bioenergy entrepreneurs over the year. Most prominent is its bioenergy policy in 2014 which was eventually updated in 2018. Now in 2022 Govt. of UP has issued its latest Bioenergy policy focusing on businesses around the agriculture industry which will eventually contribute to farmer income enhancement and employment to the locals apart from encouraging entrepreneurship development.

This policy will benefit proposed / upcoming units along with the capacity expansion of existing units. The policy covers the entire value chain from the development of feedstock to product utilization. The assured feedstock is one of the key imperatives for any CBG plant addressed in this policy via entire supply chain development using barren land utilization for the production of energy crops which would be used as feedstock for CBG production. The subsidy provision for mechanization of feedstock production, collection, and storage via Farmer Producer companies will eventually ensure a steady supply of feedstock to CBG plants and also ensure steady income to farmers in that area with periodic cash flow as against other agricultural products but not limited to. The assured support for evacuation of biofertilizers to farmers via the existing fertilizer value chain of the government of UP.

The govt is committed to offering financial support of total 700 cars over the next 5 years which will suppose to build CBG's production capacity of appx. 1000 TPD. This support is apart from expenditure on approach road and supply chain development efforts.

Major Highlights of the UP State Bioenergy policy are as below,

1.       Subsidy benefits

a.       Capex Subsidy for plant based on the production of CBG is offered for plant developers who have LOI and EOI for the development of the plant. As per policy about 75 lakhs per ton of CBG production for plant and machinery, basic infrastructure, and utility-related investments. This subsidy does not cover expenditures on land and administrative investments. The max subsidy per plant is limited to 20 Cr.

b.       Feedstock aggregator will get an additional 30% subsidy up to 20 lakhs over and above the subsidy of the central government mission for agricultural mechanization scheme. As per the central scheme, all aggregators can get up to 50% of the Capex subsidy.

c.       All subsidies shall be deposited to the plant/unit bank account after COD ( Date of Commercial operation of the plant).

2.       Duty Benefits

a.       Electricity duty benefit – All CBg projects shall get 100% exemption in electricity duty for 10 years from the date of COD.

b.       Stamp Duty – All Stamp duty expenses on rent, lease, and sales of land for plant and feedstock storage, etc.

c.       Development charges exemption as applicable by respective development authorities.

3.       Other Benefits – All units over 50 Cr investment will be offered the facility of approach road up to 5 KM from the plant as applicable by Govt.

UPNEDA will be the noddle agency for these projects all related matters for the policy duration. All units with LOI and EOI from OMC can register themselves under this scheme and the required documents are as below,

a.       Application form

b.       Company registration certificate/documents as applicable

c.       Share the certificate of the company

d.       Last three financial year balance sheet. For startup companies financial credentials of the mother/parent group to be submitted.

e.       Detailed Pre-feasibility report of the project

f.        Non-refundable Registration fees of INR 10,000/- per plant in the form of a demand draft.

The plant developer shall provide the following documents within three months of registration for authority approval.

a.       Detailed Project Report (DPR)

b.       Biomass / Feedstock assessment report

c.       Land documents

d.       Project planning report with timelines of critical milestones.

e.       Water availability/allotment documents as applicable.

f.        NOC of local development authority as applicable.

All developers shall submit performance security for about 3% of the investment of the plant as per DPR estimates. The implementation agreement shall be done after depositing the performance security. The plant construction shall be completed within 2 years from the implementation agreement. Any extension to this  shall be a maximum of 2 months if the said delay is due to reasons beyond the control of the developer and duly certified by the noddle agency.

The developer will be allotted up to 10 acres of the land for the processing plant and up to 25 acres of the land for feedstock storage and handling for a period up to 30 years. All duties regarding land shall be exempted during the policy tenure.

Noddle agency will facilitate the CBG plant value chain from feedstock allotment to infrastructural support for Bio-fertilizer sale apart for the local dispensing station for CBG evacuation. For more details kindly refer to detailed UP Bioenergy Policy 2022 document at http://upneda.org.in/

Monday, October 3, 2022

Press Mud is a potential fuel of the future and sustainable Fertilizer.

 

The Indian sugar industry is like the Kalpvriksha as during its processing yields products and co-products which has significant values in the market. Over the year utilization pattern of these products has undergone significant change due to various reasons in and around the sugar industry. The prices of sugar can been traditionally decided by the Indian sugar policy and as of now its is FRP based system which effectively linked to sugar recovery via various means / products like sugar, sugar syrup, molasses B-heavy grade etc but not limited to. As per Indian sugar policy latest edition the revenue from sugar and its co-products such as bagasse, Molasses, and Pressmud shall be shared with farmers. The Indian biofuel policy 2018 and its subsequent amendment / update enabled Indian sugar industry to use its products and co-product in more productive ways than before . This collectively contributed to increase in farmers income in quite significant way in recent past.
Almost all the co-product from sugar mill are used quite innovatively which somehow linked to the national interest of energy requirement at one end and the farmers income enhancement on other. Sugar, Molasses and Bagasse added significant value to Indian sugar industry over the years. Whereas another co-product which is slightly underutilized so far in content to extent of value other product added.
Pressmud which is commonly known as filter cake or press cake in sugar industry. It is residue of juice clarification process where main product is clear juice and impurities settled at bottom then filtered traditionally using rotary vacuum filter. In rotary vacuum filter all best possible efforts for recovery of sugar is made and final filtered residue is called filter cake or press cake. Typical generation of pressmud is about 3-5 to 4+% w/w of the cane crushing capacity of the mill. During this filtration process bagasilo is added as filter aid which is nothing but fine bagasse particle made this method of filtration very popular in the sugar mill due to no additional expenses of filter aid. In recent past there are some mills who tried using centrifugal decanter for separation of mud /cake from juice clarification process but due to multiple reasons it fail to impress the industry.
Press mud is basically a mud i.e. dirt and good amount of bagasilo and inorganic impurity courtesy to clarification process in sugar mill. Way back when distilleries were only used for potable alcohol production majority of pressmud was distributed to farmers who used it as organic fertilizer in sugar cane fields. When the when Ethanol was projected as Biofuel and various schemes to push to enhance production Ethanol then bio-composting using press mud as prominent substrate is gain boost as method of zero liquid discharge apart from other measure to ensure the zero pollution from distilleries. Evacuation of bio-fertilizers was one the major challenge in this method of spent wash treatment which in most of the cases became expense to such industries rather than became value added co-product. It might have solved the sugar mill press mud evacuation issue but it just got shifted to distilleries. The multifold increase in sugar mill capacities changed the dynamics of the press mud utilization in recent past. As a result which was supposed to be one of the potential co-product confined to as intermediate which generally transferred from sugar mill to some way of utilization or treatment at either unsold value or notional value.
As govt of India drafted a biofuel policy in 2018 for both liquid and gaseous fraction of green, clean and indigenous biofuel which will significantly contribute to countries energy security. Compressed biogas was seen one of the major gaseous biofuel which will solve multiple national issues and convert them to opportunity. The government of India has launched the SATAT ( Sustainable alternative toward affordable transportation) program which will target setting up about 5000 Compressed Biogas plant which potentially suffice the natural gas requirement to the greater extent while solving pollution issue of country.
The SATAT program enabled Indian entrepreneur to come up with innovative ways of extracting biogas from low value raw materials and covert them to value added co-products like fuel and fertilizers. As mentioned in my previous article ( link- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/feedstocks-compressed-natural-gas-production-bharat-kadu/) the best possible feedstock for biogas / Compressed biogas Gas (CBG) Production shall have following attribute but not limited to.

1.      Higher Window of availability
2.      Ease of Access and assured supply
3.      Minimal Transport and handling requirement
4.      Decent Yield of product and by-product
5.      Relatively Ease of conversion
6.      Benefit to society and their involvement in the process
Looking at feedstock under consideration press mud became one the most popular choice of the project developers even though there is huge push for rice straw and other agri residue.
At present sugar industry encashed Pressmud whenever opportunity is there on an average value of 100-400 Rs/MT which is about 4 to 16 Rs/MT of cane crushed. IF this Pressmud is used in bio-composting with Pressmud then Pressmud contribution of fertilizer is appx. 200-250 kg per MT of press mud used and average Bio-Composting selling price is 700-1000 Rs/MT which results in appx value realization of about 140 to 400 Rs/MT excluding cost of production which is generally higher than the selling price as prime objective manufacturing such biofertilizers is compliance to Zero liquid discharge requirement of distillery effluent not the production of fertilizer.
In recent past due to exponential increase in coal prices the cheaper alternative demand has gone up significantly. The Pressmud in some cases is sun dried and converted to pellets which can substitute some of the high cost fuel in short term resulted in demand for Pressmud for the application other than bio-composting.
One ton of average specification of press mud if converted to CBG then appx. 40 kg or CBG is produced along with about 110-130 kg of solid biofertilizers and 500-700 lit of liquid fertilizer. The Solid fertilizer market selling price is about 2.5 to 3.0 Rs/Kg and as per latest CBG pricing & Retail selling prices of CNG one can expect min 65 Rs/kg for CBG as safe bet. The Revenues from such conversion adds up to about 3000 Rs/MT of Pressmud. The potential revenue from press mud to CBG could be about 120 Rs/MT of Cane crushing which is significantly higher than what we are getting as on of now.
The better value utilization of Pressmud will definitely resulting in significant increase in farmer’s income if the benefits passed on to farmer ensuring sustainable CBG manufacturing business which will result in win-win for all the stockholder of the value chain.
Please note these are just estimated number which moving forward needs to be evaluated for specific case which will largely cover the situation in most of the mills of India.
This will enable all sugar mills to become a true bio-refinery which will be significant pillar of Indian food and energy security apart from connecting millions of farmers to building nation which is self-sufficient and making India the Next Super power. 

Tuesday, September 20, 2022

Feedstocks for Compressed Natural Gas Production

 
Biogas is a familiar name in Indian households thanks to various efforts from our government's push for clean fuels across India in the past. Biogas is a gaseous mixture produced by the anaerobic digestion of organic raw materials. Biogas is mainly comprised of Methane, Carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide and saturated moisture but not limited to. In the past production of biogas was limited to farm yard manure and utilization for cooking applications in rural parts of India and lately large capacity biogas plants was very popular in industries with high organic loading in their effluents. The large capacity biogas was then mainly used for the generation of heat and power for the captive applications. Moving forward the demand for electricity and electrification of the grid in the interior part of India resulted in the concept of Bio-Power or Alternative energy resources along with solar and wind for the supply of electricity to our household.
Biogas generation is a proven process in the industry and is very close to each one of us as we carry one digester in our belly every day since we were born. If one drives the analogy between the digestion of food by living beings like humans, Animals etc one can say whatever they can use as food either as is or with some preparation like cooking, marinating, fermenting etc but not limited to can be potentially converted to Biogas in a controlled atmosphere.
The material around us generally has some distinct element which has its own significance if biogas generation is desired. These elements can be enlisted as below,
a.      Organic fraction (Carbon)
    1.  Volatile Organic Matter – Generally this fraction can be converted to various reaction products with ease as against balance components.
    2. Non-Volatile Organic Matter – Recalcitrant like organic polymer, lignin etc but not limited to
b.      Inorganic Fraction- All inorganic element collective called Ash.
c.      Moisture – It’s an equilibrium content at a given condition or as per downstream process.
Each and every element/material around us have either of it and the ease of converting it to an end product will drive the conversion process and end product. It could be the table which I am using right now as it is made up of particle board. However, The selection of raw material for the production of compressed biogas has various dimensions as below but not limited to,

1.      Window of availability – Higher is preferred

2.      Access to raw material

3.      Transport requirement

4.      Storage and handling requirements

5.      Cost elements like securing, transport, Processing etc

6.      Yield of product and byproduct

7.      Ease of conversion

8.      Sustainability of supply chain

9.      Environmental impact and opportunity

10.  Benefit to society and their involvement

As a part of the SATAT program, we have identified various raw materials which we as a nation see issues in a way converted to opportunities for energy sustainability of India. Following are some of the raw materials which is in major focus for compressed biogas generation but not limited to,
    A.     Agricultural Waste: This is one of the most readily available with a limited window of availability of 30-60 Days in most cases. These are high on lignin and inorganics need state-of-the-art technology for effective conversion to CBG. The typical yield from this material can be up to 500 Am3/DMT depending upon composition and conversion process. Major agricultural waste is rice straw which is one of the major reason behind Air pollution in the northern part of India which is effectively being converted to Compressed Biogas.
    B.     Cow Dung: Cow dung is another potential feedstock available in abundance which is being potentially converted to Biogas for years altogether and now it can be converted to Compressed biogas at points of bulk generation like large Cow Shelters (Goshals), Diary Farms and cluster etc but not limited to. One can expect biogas yield up to 50 m3/MT depending upon composition and quality and process for conversion.
    C.     Press mud: Press mud is another organized source of feedstock. It is mainly a by-product from Indian sugar mills and is rich in organic which can be effectively converted to Compressed Biogas. Indian sugar production is more than 340 MMT which potentially generates about 1.3 MMT press mud which is presently utilized for bio-composting of Vinasse, Fertilizer ( As is basis), BioFuel (Briquette ) etc but not limited to. Looking at Non-bio-composting based zero liquid discharge trends in the distillery industry possibility of large-scale press mud availability for potential generation of CBG can not be denied. The press mud can produce upto 130 m3/ MT biogas or even higher as claimed by technology providers could be a welcome addition for sugar mills and all entrepreneurs for building CBG business. The press mud window of availability is upto 220 days a year at some places and about 130-150 days on average for mill operation. Press mud is perishable feedstock and without adequate provision for preservation significant loss of yield can be envisaged.
    D.     MSW: Over 60 MMT of generation and lack of processing & treatment facility to the scale of generation makes MSW is one of the major issue to tackle in India. Most of the MSW generated in India can be potentially converted to biogas. The segregation of the the MSW fraction is the ley hurdle in the process which need to be addressed to open up the CBG potential. The segregated MSW can produce upto 130 m3/MT biogas depending on level of segregation and composition of the MSW.
    E.      Food waste: India is known for diversity in food across the geography of the country. Sad part of the story is that we also waste significant amount of food via organized value chain of hotels and restaurants. Some of the cities in India are putting their best efforts in collection of food waste and treating them in dedicated facility for better utilization of its potential.
    F.      Municipal Sewage treatment plants: Indian STP are dominated by aerobic treatment technologies which generate lot of sludge for disposal which can be treated for production of biogas. Also all upcoming STP shall be designed to produce higher sludge for recovery of energy in the form of CBG. The implementation of Anaerobic treatment technologies for direct generation of biogas from STP and then converting it to CBG also can be thought of moving forward.
    G.     Industrial Waste water: All industrial wastewater with higher organic loading and significant biogas generation potential can be thought of to produce CBG as value added co-product rather as source of Heat and Power wherever possible.
  The future of the compressed biogas project lies in access to lower cost Feedstocks that are readily available in the vicinity of the plant for a larger window of availability during the year.


Identification and Evaluation of best suitable feedstock for Compressed Biogas production




My childhood memories cannot be complete without one of our family friends who loves to ask us tricky questions to us and I personally always fall into his trap. One of the questions is “Which one is more? One kilogram of cotton or One kilogram of iron.” The beauty of the question is that it looks very simple and tempting but one needs to have adequate knowledge about the subject otherwise it will trick you for sure. Over the years in the industry, such questions rather dilemmas never lost their relevance irrespective of innovation in ways of doing things in the recent past.

The compressed biogas (CBG) industry is not alien to such questions. One such question which we would like to elaborate on today is the selection of feedstock quantity. Most of us must have come across many aspirants in the market who want to set up a plant for ABC Ton of waste to CBG plant and they appear to be firm in the ton of waste processing irrespective of its specification and its overall impact on final products. It is not about the capability of the project developer but the area where we need to put our best effort to ensure we select the best mix of raw materials for a sustainable CBG project in a longer duration. For doing so one needs to understand the basic of feedstock and how it get translated to final products mainly CBG. We would be using some of the typical composition of the feedstock with an average yield of gas and then extend the data to some common baseline to evaluate all the feedstock on the same level field.

The feedstocks in consideration are as below and their typical specification is as mentioned in the table. Please don’t go by the values they could be here and there but the trend needs to be captured.

Sr. No

Feedstock

Typical TS

Typical TVS

Avg. Biogas Yield on as is basis (Sm3/MT)

% w/w

% w/w

1

OFMSW

25-30

65-75

80-100

2

Napier Grass

25-30

75-80

120-180

3

Poultry Litter

25-28

70-75

80-100

4

Press Mud

25-30

70-75

80-120

5

Segregated Food Waste

25-30

85-90

110-130

6

Paddy Straw

90-92

70-75

350-400

7

Cow Dung / Farm manure

15-20

55-65

40-50


The yield per MT of as is feedstock varies from 40 to 400 sm3/MT which is the very high range and could be confusing for some for comparison, evaluation and arriving at the right blend for the particular plant under a given set of conditions. In business what works there might not work here so the team needs to be very vigilant when referring the set of feedstock from the particular location/plant in content to some other plant.

When one say a particular feedstock has X yield and some other has Y then what do they actually mean? Let's try to elaborate this further. One can notice that above mentioned feedstock has a varying levels of TS and Moisture content. As biogas generation process only generates biogas which is methane, Carbon dioxide, Hydrogen sulfide etc with saturated moisture by equilibrium. To make it simple the volatile / digestible portion of organic only get converted to biogas and average efficiency of its conversion is typically 55-65% based on the type of reactor assuming stable operating conditions. Generally, total volatile solids fraction is considered to be digestible and the rest is non-digestible portion. Non-digestible is mostly Ash part of it and lignin like hard to digest components. For this evaluation lets consider TVS as a basis then all the feedstock on dry basis looks like as mentioned in the below table.

Sr. No

Feedstock

Typical TS

Typical TVS

TVS

% w/w

% w/w

Kg/DMT

1

OFMSW

30

70

700.0

2

Napier Grass

25

80

800.0

3

Poultry Litter

28

75

750.0

4

Press Mud

30

72

720.0

5

Segregated Food Waste

30

90

900.0

6

Paddy Straw

90

75

750.0

7

Cow Dung / Farm manure

20

65

650.0


  The average volatile solid content of any feedstock is about 750 kg per Dry MT and considering 55 to 65% avg degradation efficiency of TVS the average biogas generation could be 350 sm3/ DMT. If this is to be represented as CBG potential it will look somewhat as below,

Sr. No

Feedstock

Typical TS

Typical TVS

TVS

CBG yield

% w/w

% w/w

Kg/DMT

kg/DMT

1

OFMSW

30

70

700.0

113.3

2

Napier Grass

25

80

800.0

240

3

Poultry Litter

28

75

750.0

128.6

4

Press Mud

30

72

720.0

113.3

5

Segregated Food Waste

30

90

900.0

146.7

6

Paddy Straw

90

75

750.0

155.6

7

Cow Dung / Farm manure

20

65

650.0

90.0


This is only one dimension of yield and as a common logic goes one should use the feedstock with the highest yield and try to avoid the one with the lowest yield, right. But wait let’s try to superimpose the economical viewpoint on this table and see how much each kg of CBG produced cost us for sourcing the feedstock. We have assumed the cost of feedstock as landed cost inside the plant and if some other components which could be site specific will impact either of the value accordingly.

Sr. No

Feedstock

Typical TS

Biogas Yield

CBG Yield

Feedstock Cost

CBG Loading

% w/w

m3/MT as is

kg/ MT as is

Rs/ MT As is

Rs / Kg CBG

1

OFMSW

30

85

34

100

2.9

2

Napier Grass

25

150

60

1000

16.7

3

Poultry Litter

28

90

36

400

11.1

4

Press Mud

30

85

34

300

8.8

5

Segregated Food Waste

30

110

44

100

2.3

6

Paddy Straw

90

350

140

3000

21.4

7

Cow Dung / Farm manure

20

45

18

500

28


There could be cases of higher yield at higher costs, Lower yield at a higher cost, and Moderate yield at average cost of feedstock. This matrix will be project-specific and values will change from project to project but the trend and impact of it need to be evaluated in accordance with the specific projects so that the optimum feedstock mix can be arrived at. The feedstock is a very important aspect of any CBG project as it is on of the highest recurring cost of operation and can be as high as 35 to 40% of the overall operating expenses of the plant. Not only the cost of sourcing the feedstock mix will drive storage and handling requirement, Processing technology and utilities consume mainly power for conversion to CBG. Please note power and feedstock togather controls upto 70% of overall plant operating cost and through full evaluation of it through a systematic evaluation template and method for each plant.

At actuality how much amount could be spared for sourcing feedstock will depend on price of final product realized at the particular site along with the encashment of byproducts. However, looking at the present scenario I will personally be very cautious whenever the feedstock loading on CBG goes beyond INR 15 per kg CBG in the preliminary evaluation and mark red for further detailing.

Please don’t go by the values as these will change its relevance case to case and level of detailing but the overall trend shall not be missed.

The article https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/feedstocks-compressed-natural-gas-production-bharat-kadu/ could be best pre-read for this article.